Depends on how much gravitas the Pac has.Wouldn't surprise me if our NET is in the 60s entering the P12T if we win at Utah.
I think 22 wins puts us on the Bubble & 23 would give us better than even odds.
Depends on how much gravitas the Pac has.Wouldn't surprise me if our NET is in the 60s entering the P12T if we win at Utah.
I think 22 wins puts us on the Bubble & 23 would give us better than even odds.
Everyone who won besides us and TCU was a lock.All of those top ten upsets yesterday doesn't help us. All of those teams that won had an improvement in their net also and possibly keeps them above us. For example, MSU was 36 and went to 33 after beating Purdue. Small point, but . . .
"claw through the muck" is an apt description of our path, continuing with mucky Utah on the roadEveryone who won besides us and TCU was a lock.
For CU right now, the bigger ones are games like UVA losing at home to FSU on a miracle 3 & Wichita State getting run out of the building right now vs Memphis. Or KSU & Dayton losing. We've got to claw through the muck to have a good enough number to make our case. I think it's gonna be hard to say the P12 is only a 3-bid league.
There are some things that should happen today and tomorrow that should position our Buffs to move into NET 60s with a win at Utah tomorrow.Just keep winning, about all they can do.
I hope so. That ****ing ASU game, damn man, that one hurt. Take care of business against Utah, have a good Pac12 tourney or win it. We don't, some help would be appreciated.There are some things that should happen today and tomorrow that should position our Buffs to move into NET 60s with a win at Utah tomorrow.
Tomorrow?There are some things that should happen today and tomorrow that should position our Buffs to move into NET 60s with a win at Utah tomorrow.
It was brought up in another thread, but I have to think that if we beat ASU the chances we beat UofA are much lower. What continues to cause me anguish are the home losses to Oregon and USC. Both games we had no business losing and would've given us significant NET boosts.ASU loss looms large
Friday, after tomorrow's results are in. Possibility of some craziness today which would move us up a half dozen spots, but that's highly unlikely.Tomorrow?
IIRC we lost Eli right before the USC and UCLA home games. I think he would have made the difference against either, maybe both. Clifford needed a little time with his expanded role before he elevated his game.It was brought up in another thread, but I have to think that if we beat ASU the chances we beat UofA are much lower. What continues to cause me anguish are the home losses to Oregon and USC. Both games we had no business losing and would've given us significant NET boosts.
This is what bugs me. For (ahem) gambling reasons, I've had the misfortune of watching Toledo play twice in the last month and a half. We would beat them by double digits. Plus, their schedule was/is worse than ours.#75 today.
As expected, moved past West Virginia and Vanderbilt but the Toledo win pushed them ahead of us to #73.
This is what happens when you play this type of OOC schedule (NET ratings).We are the lowest power conference team with 19 wins in NET at 76. Closest ahead of us with 19 plus wins is Creighton at 60. Truly frustrating this will probably be the difference in us being in the tourney. If we had the same record in the Mountain West Conference this year we'd be in. Wyoming who is 4th in the MWC is considered in the tourney by most projections and has a 47 NET.
Kansas cancellation looms large. And if we beat S Illinois we'd play CSU which would help. Colorado's home wins are all downgraded because of altitude and home court advantage which sucks. Wyo is at a higher altitude and has a good fanbase too. You'd think this would also hurt any Duke or Kansas home game even more.This is what happens when you play this type of OOC schedule (NET ratings).
Home
129 Montana St
165 New Mexico
353 Maine
8 Tennessee
223 E Washington
333 Milwaukee
287 CSU Bakersfield
Neutral
130 S Illinois
277 Duquesne
215 Brown
Road: None
It has probably been asked and answered elsewhere in the thread - but it is not like we didn't try to play KU - the game just got Covided. What's the effect on our net if we just get to play and lose that game?This is what happens when you play this type of OOC schedule (NET ratings).
Home
129 Montana St
165 New Mexico
353 Maine
8 Tennessee
223 E Washington
333 Milwaukee
287 CSU Bakersfield
Neutral
130 S Illinois
277 Duquesne
215 Brown
Road: None
Kansas cancellation looms large. And if we beat S Illinois we'd play CSU which would help. Colorado's home wins are all downgraded because of altitude and home court advantage which sucks. Wyo is at a higher altitude and has a good fanbase too. You'd think this would also hurt any Duke or Kansas home game even more.
However, if you look at Wyomings they lose to 2/3 Pac teams they play, they do have more games in the 100's in non-conference.
Detroit Mercy (231) W
Arkansas Pine Bluff (352) W
Washington (120) W
Grand Canyon (91) W
Hastings NAIA school not on NET W
Cal State Fullerton (168) W
Denver (291) W
Mcneese State (312) W
Arizona (2) L by 30
Utah Valley (113) W
Stanford (111) L
Northern Iowa (98) W
South Florida (239) W
However, basically they are getting the huge boost in conference games. The MWC conference has 7/11 teams in the top 90 of NET. PAC has 6/12.
MWC: Pac-12:
San Diego State: 20-7 (27 NET) Arizona 27-3 (2 NET)
CSU 22-4 (28 NET) UCLA 22-6 (12 NET)
Boise State 23-6 (30 NET) USC 25-5 (30 NET)
Wyoming 22-7 (47 NET) Wazzu 17-13 (61 NET)
Fresno State 17-11 (67 NET) Oregon 17-12 (66 NET)
Utah State 15-14 (70 NET) Colorado 19-10 (77 NET)
UNLV 17-12 (89 NET) ASU 13-16 (101 NET)
Nevada 11-16 (128 NET) Stanford 15-14 (111 NET)
New Mexico 10-18 (165 NET) Washington 15-14 (120 NET)
Air Force 11-17 (251 NET) Utah 11-18 (123 NET)
San Jose State 7-21 (290 NET) Cal 12-18 (139 NET)
OSU 3-26 (247 NET)
Wyoming is rewarded for beating CSU and Boise state once a piece at home, Utah State twice, and at fresno state once.
Colorado isn't getting credit for beating WSU and Arizona at home, and at Oregon.
MWC is not a better conference than the PAC. Yet all the metrics are holding up those teams.
Fresno State, Utah State, and UNLV who are in the TOP 90 of NET wouldn't finish 5-8 in the PAC like they did in MWC.
Then this baffles me even more! MWC viewed in a better light than the PAC anyway you slice it.The NET doesn't include any penalty for playing at altitude. That's another rating.
Maybe it's because the MWC is close to or slightly better than the Pac-12 this season. I seriously doubt Wyoming would lose 2/3 of it's games playing a Pac-12 schedule this season. Wyoming has earned their NET rating. Their OOC is significantly better than CU's. They won 3 road games OOC and their neutral site win against Northern Iowa is better than any CU OOC win.Then this baffles me even more! MWC viewed in a better light than the PAC anyway you slice it.
Maybe it's because the MWC is close to or slightly better than the Pac-12 this season. I seriously doubt Wyoming would lose 2/3 of it's games playing a Pac-12 schedule this season. Wyoming has earned their NET rating. Their OOC is significantly better than CU's. They won 3 road games OOC and their neutral site win against Northern Iowa is better than any CU OOC win.
MWC vs Pac-12 this season:
Boise St won at WSU
Wyoming won at Washington, lost neutral site to Stanford, lost at Arizona
New Mexico lost at CU
UNLV won home against Cal, lost home against UCLA
SDSU won neutral against ASU, lost neutral against USC
Fresno St lost at Cal, lost at Utah
Nevada won neutral against Washington
San Jose St lost at Stanford
Utah St and Air Force didn't play a Pac-12 school
So, Pac-12 went 8-5 against MWC, but 7 of the games were Pac-12 home, 4 neutral and 2 at MWC. I'd say that's a draw in head-to-head competition.
We'd beat Wyoming by 12. Guaranteed.We are the lowest power conference team with 19 wins in NET at 76. Closest ahead of us with 19 plus wins is Creighton at 60. Truly frustrating this will probably be the difference in us being in the tourney. If we had the same record in the Mountain West Conference this year we'd be in. Wyoming who is 4th in the MWC is considered in the tourney by most projections and has a 47 NET.
Depends where the game is played. Laramie has always been a nightmare for CU.We'd beat Wyoming by 12. Guaranteed.
I think Boulder has also been a nightmare which is why we stopped playing themDepends where the game is played. Laramie has always been a nightmare for CU.