This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Am I missing something or is this the same thing discussed a couple of months back? At the time Wilner and others were agreeing it was a good decision, as ESPN was offering an extreme low-ball price.
Honestly not sure. It was in today’s email, but no link to specifics.
I'm sure it must be the same thing. They turned it down because ESPN was offering really low rates and wanted a very long term contract. All involved thought at this point it was better to have everything available in a few years when contracts get redone. Also Scott wouldn't have been able to make that call unilaterally. Not disagreeing on his needing to be fired for other reasons though.
They would have had to. As I understand it, Scott is required to bring any legit proposal or offer to the presidents for a vote. He can't unilaterally decide not to consider an option for OU/OSU to join the conference, an ESPN investment proposal, etc.
awfulannouncing.com
That quote just proves that Scott is the highly paid fall guy for the presidents. The only way he says that or takes some of the actions he has is if the presidents have told him that it actually is his job responsibility. As these things usually go, when the decision gets made to change commissioners I expect that they'll justify the new person with some talk about business background and the future needs of the conference.Pac-12 Networks president defends networks' revenue issues by saying the point isn't to make money
The Pac-12 Networks' president said their goal is to "amplify student-athletes and their experiences," but that's not helping the schools' bottom lines.
SIAP
YikesPac-12 Networks president defends networks' revenue issues by saying the point isn't to make money
The Pac-12 Networks' president said their goal is to "amplify student-athletes and their experiences," but that's not helping the schools' bottom lines.
SIAP
So you won’t watch the Buffs, your “favorite” team, because you aren’t willing to pay $30 a month to sling for 5 months to watch them? Or even stream it from Reddit for free? Now I think I understand why you bought a Nub hat...
Please be joking. Otherwise quit calling yourself a Buff.
CSU is on ESPN and probably Utah will also, so you need Aug 30 to Nov 30, 3 months and a day. I think last year the CSU game was on CBSSN, which I watched on a free week on Fubo, then got Sling through December.
Well they do have a few teams that run the option in the MWC.
I'm deciding whether to start streaming or keep dish. Given the choice I'll usually watch a Big12 or SEC game before a Pac12 game not involving the Buffs.
That website looks sketchy. Whats the catch?
Seriously. What’s the catch?
I have used it for over a year, along with approx. 15 freinds/families I know, Everyone loves it. No catch. Try it for a month, you will see. You get all NBA, MLB, NFL and hockey channels as well - all sports packages are free.
