BuffAlum2007
Well-Known Member
...and only 2 other players scored for ASU the entire game
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
2019-20 Pac-12 MBB Thread
- Thread starter Buffnik
- Start date
...and only 2 other players scored for ASU the entire game
I just checked the stat sheet. It's insane. Dude jacked up 29 shots. ASU also went 14% on three-pointers.
If you can handle ASU's pressure, they become an easy out. St. Mary's is the worst possible type of matchup for ASU with how disciplined they are with the ball.
Oregon didn’t lose today, but they only beat 3-8 Texas Southern by 6. They were 27.5 point favorites. But the buffs are doomed because they didn’t play good against Sacramento State.Love the usual suspects this last week crying about how doomed CU is because the conference is filled with so many teams better than us. Then all those “powerhouses“ get it handed to them today.
Dude really?
He meant ‘partial set of wooden teeth’.
For the conference.
There is one more game tonight as UW faces Houston in the championship of the Diamond Head Classic
PAC-12 teams in KenPom “Tier A/B” games:
Oregon - 6 (3-2 A, 1-0 B)
USC - 6 (1-1 A, 3-1 B)
ASU - 6 (0-3 A, 1-2 B)
CU - 5 (1-1 A, 3-0 B)
Utah - 5 (1-1 A, 3-0 B)
Washington - 4 (1-3 A, 0-0 B)
UCLA - 4 (0-4 A, 0-0 B)
Cal - 4 (0-1 A, 0-3 B)
Arizona - 3 (0-2 A, 1-0 B)
Stanford - 3 (0-2 A, 1-0 B)
OSU - 2 (0-0 A, 0-2 B)
Wazzu - 0
First comment is TCU choking cost us a tier A game. Currently, Clemson isn’t A or B, although with help from the ACC that should change.
Secondly there will be lots of changes as we’ll see some of the lesser teams move into a tier B as they beat up on their weaker conference opponents.
Oregon - 6 (3-2 A, 1-0 B)
USC - 6 (1-1 A, 3-1 B)
ASU - 6 (0-3 A, 1-2 B)
CU - 5 (1-1 A, 3-0 B)
Utah - 5 (1-1 A, 3-0 B)
Washington - 4 (1-3 A, 0-0 B)
UCLA - 4 (0-4 A, 0-0 B)
Cal - 4 (0-1 A, 0-3 B)
Arizona - 3 (0-2 A, 1-0 B)
Stanford - 3 (0-2 A, 1-0 B)
OSU - 2 (0-0 A, 0-2 B)
Wazzu - 0
First comment is TCU choking cost us a tier A game. Currently, Clemson isn’t A or B, although with help from the ACC that should change.
Secondly there will be lots of changes as we’ll see some of the lesser teams move into a tier B as they beat up on their weaker conference opponents.
BehindEnemyLines
beware the habu
Good stuff, Goose.
What is the dividing line for A vs B?
Oh, and wtf wazzu. That be a goose egg yer totin'.
Short version: A game in Tier A represents a top 50 opponent adjusting for the location of the game, and Tier B is the same concept for a top 100 opponent.
Non-conference play is over for every Pac-12 team and the polls & computer ranks have updated through Sunday's games. Here's the Pac-12 team profiles ahead of the conference season:
| TEAM | RECORD | NET RANK | KENPOM RANK |
| Colorado | 11-2 (0-0) | 23 | 34 |
| #4 Oregon | 11-2 (0-0) | 11 | 9 |
| Stanford | 11-2 (0-0) | 21 | 55 |
| USC | 11-2 (0-0) | 72 | 68 |
| Oregon State | 10-2 (0-0) | 76 | 70 |
| #25 Arizona | 10-3 (0-0) | 18 | 16 |
| Washington | 10-3 (0-0) | 43 | 45 |
| Utah | 9-3 (0-0) | 62 | 108 |
| Arizona State | 9-4 (0-0) | 57 | 87 |
| Washington State | 9-4 (0-0) | 127 | 143 |
| UCLA | 7-6 (0-0) | 179 | 127 |
| California | 6-7 (0-0) | 184 | 191 |
Wtf is UCLA's problem? I haven't really watched them play.
Transitioning under a new coach and system, mostly. As always they have talent, but when I've watched them they don't seem to have bought in or learned to play together yet. So far, they've been an awful jump shooting team. I don't believe that UCLA can't shoot (especially with Alford's recruiting priorities that built most of this roster), so I'm looking at them as the team from the Pac-12's bottom 3 that has the potential to figure it out and turn into a real problem for the teams above them. They've been a mess, though.
LifeofaBuff
Well-Known Member
Haven't we been asking this for several years now?
Yeah
, they aren't the Bruins of yesteryear.
ahoelsken
Well-Known Member
New Year's Resolution for Tad: Continue to make sure UCLA (the Fusker football of CBB) is our bitch in men's basketball.
Arizona gets a bump over us since we only play them once and it's in Tucson. They get a nice scheduling advantage there. On the positive side, we don't have to make a Washington trip this year and get them in Boulder.
To that point, KP points out with the clear top 3, Oregon takes a hit because they’re the only one that plays the other two the full four times.
Medford M.
Well-Known Member
****ing Washington...
UCLA is a threat to beat anyone. I think they'll end up costing the Pac-12 a tourney bid this year.