Perfect GIF nominee.
@LesGrossman please help me understand wtf is going through your head. I'm struggling to imagine how you could possibly make that comparison.Hold on. "Fat Montez" is a reference to Shedeur Sanders?!?!?!?
I don't get it.
@LesGrossman please help me understand wtf is going through your head. I'm struggling to imagine how you could possibly make that comparison.
this is an all time bad takeTravis Hunter would not be a first round pick as a WR. Just not anywhere near the big play ability of other guys.
Sorry, you're wrong.
he has also put on 15+ pounds of muscle, is on video saying "i'm at 190, gotta get to 195" (those numbers are approximate but within 2-3 lbs). he's doing the work to know where he needs to be and to be physically able to make the play when he gets there. no luck involved in a process goal that requires consistency in study and effort over yearsNo. What you saw was a player who said before the defensive series he was going to seal the win. That player then perfectly read the offensive play, showing both the preparation to recognize and the athletic ability to capitalize. Then, also because he had a chip on his shoulder because of people saying he was soft as a tackler in addition to it being a key play, he sold out on the tackle while going for the ball. That is not luck. It was a fortunate result, but it wasn't happenstance.
That's what makes mini-skirts so wonderful!Now THAT’S analytics I can get behind!
**** you I've been awesome in this threadHoly ****, I just read the last two pages of this thread. Somehow this game is making each poster the worst version of themselves!
Yes, "awesome" is actually the worst version of yourself.**** you I've been awesome in this thread
It's because I know that ultimately I will be rejected, and I want to be have some control around that. Ruckus turned out mostly fine without me.
The ball coming out was absolutely luck. Doesn't matter how prepared the player making the tackle was. Good ball security=no fumble.No. What you saw was a player who said before the defensive series he was going to seal the win. That player then perfectly read the offensive play, showing both the preparation to recognize and the athletic ability to capitalize. Then, also because he had a chip on his shoulder because of people saying he was soft as a tackler in addition to it being a key play, he sold out on the tackle while going for the ball. That is not luck. It was a fortunate result, but it wasn't happenstance.
It's because I know that ultimately I will be rejected, and I want to be have some control around that. Ruckus turned out mostly fine without me.
Luck is when something unintended or inexplicable happens.The ball coming out was absolutely luck. Doesn't matter how prepared the player making the tackle was. Good ball security=no fumble.
Maybe you don't believe that luck plays a huge role in success in sports, but it does and analytics actually back that up.
A huge part of baseball analytics factors in luck.
For every who knows how many focused attempts in creating a fumble in every game, it rarely results in a fumble.
If you try to strip a ball 19 times and on the 20th time it comes out...is that skill or was it luck that it actually came out this time?Luck is when something unintended or inexplicable happens.
No. It's skill. It's just a hard thing to accomplish. With 1/20, you're describing someone who forces a fumble every 2 or 3 games. Please let me have that guy on my team.If you try to strip a ball 19 times and on the 20th time it comes out...is that skill or was it luck that it actually came out this time?
It's luck.
It's not though. It simply isn't, dude.No. It's skill. It's just a hard thing to accomplish. With 1/20, you're describing someone who forces a fumble every 2 or 3 games. Please let me have that guy on my team.
I don't see how a low exit velocity in baseball has anything to do with someone forcing a fumble.It's not though. It simply isn't, dude.
Like I said about baseball...if a guy hits .320 with a low exit velocity, he's looked at as a sub optimal player because low exit velocities shouldn't equate to hits.
It's luck...no matter how good the batter is at placing the ball...if he doesn't hit it hard, he's getting on by luck.
And...how many be strip it attempts result in missed tackles and huge gains? Is it worth the tradeoff?No. It's skill. It's just a hard thing to accomplish. With 1/20, you're describing someone who forces a fumble every 2 or 3 games. Please let me have that guy on my team.
If you can't understand the comparison, I can't help you.I don't see how a low exit velocity in baseball has anything to do with someone forcing a fumble.
That's not really what I meant, but carry on.
If the player is giving up exceptional yards after contact, that's not acceptable unless we're talking desperation mode at the end of a game. But there doesn't have to be that tradeoff.And...how many be strip it attempts result in missed tackles and huge gains? Is it worth the tradeoff?
Is giving up a TD because you tried to force a fumble...might be recovered by the offense and be a net loss anyway...worth getting a turnover 3 weeks later?
Holy ****, I just read the last two pages of this thread. Somehow this game is making each poster the worst version of themselves!
Now THAT’S analytics I can get behind!