Welcome to the Pac-12, Pepperdine and Harvey Mudd College!
CU headed to oblivion (probably). Broncs owned by walmartians. All i have left is the Beloved DODGERS.
What if they played the game at Dorsey HS's field? Could be good for recruiting....1-4 Oregon State vs 0-5 Colorado a thousand miles away from both campuses in a city that doesn’t even support its home CFB teams is one of the worst ideas I’ve ever heard.
Let the SEC and B10 do that endless money grab commercialization. Give us games on campus against geographically similar teams. This should be about pride for our schools, not random people in LA that don’t give a f*** ffs
To be clear, I completely made that up and have no idea whether “in footprint” is determined by games (I assume it’s not).1-4 Oregon State vs 0-5 Colorado a thousand miles away from both campuses in a city that doesn’t even support its home CFB teams is one of the worst ideas I’ve ever heard.
Let the SEC and B10 do that endless money grab commercialization. Give us games on campus against geographically similar teams. This should be about pride for our schools, not random people in LA that don’t give a f*** ffs
If he wants more games in LA, they’d have to happen somehow though so I imagine it’d be a few games are selected to be played in LA from the conference slate. Makes me nauseous tbh.To be clear, I completely made that up and have no idea whether “in footprint” is determined by games (I assume it’s not).
That game would probably sell out the soccer stadium SDSU has been playing in.1-4 Oregon State vs 0-5 Colorado a thousand miles away from both campuses in a city that doesn’t even support its home CFB teams is one of the worst ideas I’ve ever heard.
Let the SEC and B10 do that endless money grab commercialization. Give us games on campus against geographically similar teams. This should be about pride for our schools, not random people in LA that don’t give a f*** ffs
If it was the difference between $30m and $50m per school, I’d have no issue with it, but I’m guessing a neutral site game in LA would probably equate to an extra $2-3m/school at best. Feels like GK is turning over every stone to squeeze every last $$ for the conference.If he wants more games in LA, they’d have to happen somehow though so I imagine it’d be a few games are selected to be played in LA from the conference slate. Makes me nauseous tbh.
Even non-con would suck. I hate everything about neutral site regular season games. It’s college football, play it at the college, that’s the point haha
Better off playing at Eddie West Field.What if they played the game at Dorsey HS's field? Could be good for recruiting....
I’m guessing less than half the people on this board will get that reference, but well done.View attachment 53069
Kliavkoff fresh off negotiations
It's a scene from Welcome Back Kotter, right?I’m guessing less than half the people on this board will get that reference, but well done.
0.00% chanceWhat happens if the Regents decide not to allow UCLA to make the move.
I wouldn't have even wasted time talking about that had I been GK. Just goes to show you how behind the eight ball this league is.California politics can be very interesting.
What happens if the Regents decide not to allow UCLA to make the move. That would leave the P12 with a program in LA.
It would also probably result in the B1G going after Oregon or Washington, or both plus one more school to stay at an even number.
0.00% chance
Allbuffs General Counsel, the ACC is headquartered in Greensboro, NC. If the GoR is challenged legally, let's say by Florida State, where would that be litigated? NC courts? federal? Florida?
That is a very interesting question. One would expect such a contract to contain a governing law and venue provision, clarifying that the contract would be interpreted according to the laws of a particular state (what lawyers could call a "choice of law provision") and that any dispute would only be litigated in one particular jurisdiction (what lawyers would call a "venue provision"). I can't find a copy of the 2016 GOR contract, but the 2013 contract is available, and is silent on those two questions. I would bet that the 2016 contact used the same format and just changed the dates, so I bet that the current GOR contract is similarly lacking in those provisions.Allbuffs General Counsel, the ACC is headquartered in Greensboro, NC. If the GoR is challenged legally, let's say by Florida State, where would that be litigated? NC courts? federal? Florida?
Thats just not realistic in my opinion because none of those schools fit in the SEC. And its the gained TV audience for ESPN that matters. There are bean counters at ESPN that know what those markets are worth. The Ad dollars have to be positive. The carriage fees have to be positive. People have to tune in. We all know school specific alums will tune in. But you need the rest of the casual market to as well.True. But I don't think that ESPN wants to be pretty much locked out of both western time zones. They could be the ones pushing it if the B1G did take Cal, Stanford, Oregon & Washington.
I decided to search further, and all I could find was a portion of the bylaws on the Clemson website, but searching for the ACC bylaws found results for:That is a very interesting question. One would expect such a contract to contain a governing law and venue provision, clarifying that the contract would be interpreted according to the laws of a particular state (what lawyers could call a "choice of law provision") and that any dispute would only be litigated in one particular jurisdiction (what lawyers would call a "venue provision"). I can't find a copy of the 2016 GOR contract, but the 2013 contract is available, and is silent on those two questions. I would bet that the 2016 contact used the same format and just changed the dates, so I bet that the current GOR contract is similarly lacking in those provisions.
That being said, the ACC's Constitution and Bylaws probably contain such provisions, and I can't easily find a copy of that online. When I searched, what came up was the bylaws of the Atlantic Coast Conference of the Mennonite Church. Which was interesting from an intellectual standpoint, but not helpful.
/ law nerd!There is probably an arbitration provision.
Look at Mr Moneybags over here somehow has access to the Pac12 network thru their provideri think one can read quite a bit into the absence of the ads at the p12 media thing.
our impending doom is becoming quite clear.
why do i feel like without any known real facts our position continues to get worse?
is it panic or realism...