I will be happy if we can limit our D to one illegal participation penalty.
AllBuffs | Unofficial fan site for the University of Colorado at Boulder Athletics programs
This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
-
Prime Time. Prime Time. Its a new era for Colorado football. Consider signing up for a club membership! For $20/year, you can get access to all the special features at Allbuffs, including club member only forums, dark mode, avatars and best of all no ads ! But seriously, please sign up so that we can pay the bills. No one earns money here, and we can use your $20 to keep this hellhole running. You can sign up for a club membership by navigating to your account in the upper right and clicking on "Account Upgrades". Make it happen!
NDSU Football only RunRunRun, death by 1000 cuts no Pass
- Thread starter gobison123
- Start date
- Status
That's the real "Death from 1000 cuts" right there.
I call it a Kelly’s Dozen!
Or eating 1,000 jalapenos in less than one day.
Goals.
It's certainly been a topic of conversation on several shows lately. Even forehead Screaming A Smith has been bitching about it. Fvck that clown.
I do both usually.I can sort of understand listening to bad sports radio back in the day, but why still subject yourself to that now when you can listen to a podcast you actually like?
They redshirted behind 2 guys who went to the NFL and NDSU is known for developing linemen, so I wouldn't count them out. I think our OL and running backs are our questions. Howell talked with his NDSU counterpart, who said their 2-deep was the weakest in some years. Buffs by 24.
Ok I'm glad I wasn't the only one that caught that. How can we play on a 106 yard field
Our OL will be the question, not RB. As long as the OL performs, our RB will have a lot of yardages this year.
Completely agree. I've never been much of a sports talk radio person, but I've completely moved on from channel flipping as a concept after cutting the cable cord last year. I don't miss "TV" at all. Podcasts are great. Selecting what you want to spend your time with, as opposed to just flipping channels has been a huge quality of life improvement.I can sort of understand listening to bad sports radio back in the day, but why still subject yourself to that now when you can listen to a podcast you actually like?
One thing that also has glaringly struck me is how inane most radio conversation is. I get it's hard to fill hours of time every day, but that doesn't make it worthwhile to listen to.
NGL that grass looks like a$$. We need to install sport turf.
Turf sucks and is proven to cause more injuries. The NFL is moving away from it. The grass is fine
No. No. No.
Debate about safety of synthetic turf and 'forever chemicals' raises concerns for some
Synthetic turf fields are made with "forever chemicals" perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS, according to the EPA.
abcnews.go.com
Plus turf burns ****ing hurt and it’s nearly impossible to play through a full game without multiple
Surprised the state hasn’t mandated that yet and I feel like a grass field conflicts with the messaging for a zero waste stadium. Arizona’s old turf was a fast one and I would not mind seeing something like that installed at Folsom Field.
Good article but doesn't even get into the by-products from the manufacturing process, greenhouse gases involved in manufacture and transport, the negative impact of removing that area of living grass, and then all the negatives once the turf has outlived it's usable lifespan including removal, transport, and disposal.No. No. No.
Debate about safety of synthetic turf and 'forever chemicals' raises concerns for some
Synthetic turf fields are made with "forever chemicals" perfluoroalkyl and polyfluoroalkyl substances, known as PFAS, according to the EPA.
Also have read that artificial turf results in more joint injuries (knees and ankles) and probably more head injuries as it doesn't have the same impact absorbing characteristics as a natural turf when a player's head impacts it.
Players often complain about how the NFL is disingenuous about player safety by pointing out that the NFL won't make the change because it would cost the owners money.
RBs def not a question.
Hopefully 106 at least.
We went back to natural grass in 1999 - except for ‘01 and ‘16 (sorta ‘02), **** ain’t been right since.
We had synthetic turf during the Fairbanks years
Building blocks
- Status